“Who Plays the Husband and Who Plays the Wife?”: By Eric Marcus
August 7, 2007 at 7:28 pm 4 comments
August 7, 2007
We spent this past weekend at a lovely resort in the Berkshires with our straight couple friends, Bob and Debbie. It was all so totally normal that you could almost forget that being a gay couple was ever an issue anywhere (although I’m well aware that it remains a plenty big issue in many ways and in many places). But there were a number of reminders that we still live in a world that assumes couples come in bi-gender pairs. And not everyone has comfortably adjusted to the fact of our existence.
Like a lot of places we’ve traveled to, there was a welcome note from the manager waiting for us in the room when we arrived. We’ve kept a collection of these notes from over the years because it’s fun to look back to see how they’ve been addressed: Mr. & Mrs. Marcus or Mr. & Mrs. Karpfinger. Or the notes are addressed to the two of us by name or, as was the case this past weekend, the note was addressed only to my partner, presumably because it was his credit card under which the reservation was made (although they knew that the two of us would be occupying the room).
The real fun came at dinner the first night when the four of us were scanning our menus and discussing our choices. I commented on the cost of the various tasting menus and Barney asked where on the menu I was looking. “The bottom of every page,” I said, trying desperately to hide my impatience, because it was plain as day where the prices were listed. Then Debbie said, “I don’t see them either.” It seems that someone on the wait staff had decided that Bob and I were the husbands, hence the menus with the prices (the resort is a little old fashioned when it comes to its menus), and that Barney and Debbie were the wives who needed to be kept in the dark about what the meal was costing. We had a good laugh over that one, wondering what the conversation must have been like in the kitchen as they tried to figure out our marital roles. How did they decide? Was it my manly swagger? The way we took our seats (I let Barney choose where to sit and sat down after he did)? Or was it just our overall demeanor?
With Bob and Debbie it was fairly evident who wore the pants in the family (Debbie was wearing a lovely summer dress and Bob was in coat and tie), but the waiter had no idea whether it was Bob or Debbie who was the primary wage earner. In any event, the whole thing was way confusing and totally unnecessary. They could have simply asked us about our chosen roles or they could have made things easy for themselves and given us all menus that included the prices. (The idea of priceless menus seems a little silly anyway.)
If we really wanted to have some fun, we might have asked the waiter how they came to decide who got which menu. And maybe that would have been a good thing to do—a teaching moment, perhaps, so they could think about how to handle things differently the next time they encountered a same-sex couple. Or if we’d really wanted to have some fun we could have informed the manager that we were new age, post-feminist Mormans and that Debbie was the matriarch of our happy band. Debbie liked that idea best.
Entry filed under: Uncategorized. Tags: .



1.
Harry | August 8, 2007 at 3:37 am
As a gay man only a bit younger (62) than Eric — one of my culture heroes — I can easily explain why he and Barney were assumed to be the paying party: grey hair. I have not seen a recent photo of the distiguished professor, but my own frosty locks have brought a presumption of either affluence or poverty, depending on the context. (Yes, I want a “senior” ticket at the multiplex.)
They’ve also brought me a sexy Colombiano who finds me the sexiest man alive.. Who knew?
See you soon in the4 Berkshirtes.
2.
Eric Marcus | August 8, 2007 at 11:40 am
Wait! Wait! I’m not a professor (although I believe there is a Professor Eric Marcus). And I’m 48. No grey hair, which is part of what confused us because Barney has grey hair. Following the grey hair theory, HE should have been the one to get the menu with the prices.
3.
GISELLE | September 2, 2007 at 8:04 am
HI Eric
As i read more and more of your blog, i love it! It always cover topics i been thinking about or situations i encountered.
I think the waiters either go by the attire you are wearing or the tone in your voice when ordering, for them to decide who to give the check to.
Me being a lesbian and dressing on the aggressive and masculine side, its a given! Its good to know that we all go thru the same issues.
Write on,
Giselle
4.
Barbara | October 2, 2007 at 7:47 pm
I only recently discovered your blog, and I wanted to tell you how enjoyable your entries are to me. This one particularly prompted me to post a response.
I never encountered a restaurant that gave out different menus for the (perceived) husband and wife, but my partner and I have often had similar encounters with people who seemed to have a need to see us in those conventional terms.
For us, the situation may be even more complicated, since we are both post-operative transwomen. We had our surgeries about 6 months apart, and we were lovers before either of us made the decision to have GRS, so in the course of our 6-year relationship, we have been, in order, gay males, a straight couple (after Michelle had her surgery, but before I had mine) and finally, a pair of lesbians. I like to say that we are the very embodiment of GLBT all by ourselves.
Gender roles and labels truly lose their meaning when applied to transgendered people, because the straight world, and a large portion of the gay community as well, seems to find comfort in viewing and classifying people in terms of their anatomy, whether apparent or presumed, rather than their self-identified gender. In all the time we have been together, Michelle and I never had what may be described as a traditionally “male – female” relationship. In fact, I believe that even the majority of straight couples do not consistently maintain a relationship where one is always the breadwinner, decision-maker, or “dominant” member, while the other is always supposedly more passive, or supportive, or whatever the wife is assumed to be.
In any relationship that works in the long term, both partners must be supportive of each other at all times. While one partner may seem to dominate in a particular situation or at a particular time, I believe that the best partnerships are the ones where each partner can play both roles as the situation and the needs of the other partner dictate, and such roles would not necessarily be evident to the outside observer.
I hope that some day there will be no need for such antiquated labels as “husband” and “wife” as our concept of marriage changes. I think that this may be the best contribution that gay couples can make in redefining marriage for EVERYONE. It just might be what saves the institution of marriage altogether. When will all the gay-bashers and proponents of the “sanctity of marriage” understand this?